N. Gregory Mankiw (1958) American economist
Source: Principles of Economics (1998-), Ch. 4. The Market Forces of Supply and Demand; p. 66
Dorothy Thompson’s Political Guide: A Study of American Liberalism and its Relationship to Modern Totalitarian States (1938)
Source: A Study of American Liberalism and its Relationship to Modern Totalitarian States (1938)
pp. 65-66
N. Gregory Mankiw (1958) American economist
Source: Principles of Economics (1998-), Ch. 4. The Market Forces of Supply and Demand; p. 66
Leonid Kantorovich (1912–1986) Russian mathematician
"Mathematics in Economics: Achievements, Difficulties, Perspectives," 1975
Eric Wolf (1923–1999) American anthropologist
Source: Europe and the People Without History, 1982, Chapter 12 The New Laborers, p. 354.
Theodore Levitt (1925–2006) American economist and professor at Harvard Business School
Source: Marketing Myopia, 1960, p. 10
Adair Turner, Baron Turner of Ecchinswell (1955) British businessman
Source: Economics after the crisis : objectives and means (2012), Ch. 2 : Financial Markets: Efficiency, Stability, and Income Distribution
Benjamin Creme (1922–2016) artist, author, esotericist
Source: Maitreya's Mission Vol. II (1993), After the stock markets collapse, Chapter 4, Economic Change
L. Neil Smith (1946) American writer
Ceres, Chapter Eighteen http://www.bigheadpress.com/lneilsmith/?page_id=235, 2009.
Alexander Hamilton Report on Manufactures
Report on Manufactures (1791)
Context: The Cotton Mill invented in England, within the last twenty years, is a signal illustration of the general proposition, which has been just advanced. In consequence of it, all the different processes for spinning Cotton are performed by means of Machines, which are put in motion by water, and attended chiefly by women and Children; and by a smaller number of persons, in the whole, than are requisite in the ordinary mode of spinning. And it is an advantage of great moment that the operations of this mill continue with convenience, during the night, as well as through the day. The prodigious affect of such a Machine is easily conceived. To this invention is to be attributed essentially the immense progress, which has been so suddenly made in Great Britain in the various fabrics of Cotton.
Rand Paul (1963) American politician, ophthalmologist, and United States Senator from Kentucky
2010s
Context: Technology revolutionaries succeeded not because of some collectivist vision that seeks to regulate “fairness”, “neutrality”, “privacy” or “competition” through coercive state actions, or that views the Internet and technology as a vast commons that must be freely available to all, but rather because of the same belief as America’s Founders who understood that private property is the foundation of prosperity and freedom itself. Technology revolutionaries succeed because of the decentralized nature of the Internet, which defies government control. As a consequence, decentralization has unlocked individual self-empowerment, entrepreneurialism, creativity, innovation and the creation of new markets in ways never before imagined in human history... Around the world, the real threat to Internet freedom comes not from bad people or inefficient markets -- we can and will always route around them -- but from governments' foolish attempts to manage and control innovation. And it is not just the tyrannies we must fear. The road away from freedom is paved with good intentions.
Paul A. Baran (1909–1964) American Marxist economist
Source: The Political Economy Of Growth (1957), Chapter Two, The Concept Of the Economic Surplus, p. 25