
“Philosophy's error is to be too endurable.”
All Gall Is Divided (1952)
Pt. I, ch. 1, sec. 1.
1920s, Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology (1929)
“Philosophy's error is to be too endurable.”
All Gall Is Divided (1952)
R. G. Collingwood (1937), as cited in: Patrick Suppes (1973), Logic, methodology and philosophy of science: Proceedings.
“The chief danger to philosophy is narrowness in the selection of evidence.”
Pt. V, ch. 1, sec. 1.
1920s, Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology (1929)
“Generally speaking, the errors in religion are dangerous; those in philosophy only ridiculous.”
Part 4, Section 7
Source: A Treatise of Human Nature (1739-40), Book 1: Of the understanding
C 16
Aphorisms (1765-1799), Notebook C (1772-1773)
The Law of Mind (1892)
Context: In an article published in The Monist for January, 1891, I endeavored to show what ideas ought to form the warp of a system of philosophy, and particularly emphasized that of absolute chance. In the number of April, 1892, I argued further in favor of that way of thinking, which it will be convenient to christen tychism (from τύχη, chance). A serious student of philosophy will be in no haste to accept or reject this doctrine; but he will see in it one of the chief attitudes which speculative thought may take, feeling that it is not for an individual, nor for an age, to pronounce upon a fundamental question of philosophy. That is a task for a whole era to work out. I have begun by showing that tychism must give birth to an evolutionary cosmology, in which all the regularities of nature and of mind are regarded as products of growth, and to a Schelling-fashioned idealism which holds matter to be mere specialized and partially deadened mind.
"Philosophy" (1929) as quoted by Nils-Eric Sahlin, The Philosophy of F. P. Ramsey (1990)