“The disconnected impressions which we derive from life form a kind of knowledge ‘in growth,’ as Bacon called it; an over-early and peremptory attempt to digest this knowledge into a system tends, as he suggests, to falsify and distort it.”
“English Aphorists,” p. 103
Reperusals and Recollections (1936)
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Logan Pearsall Smith37
British American-born writer 1865–1946Related quotes
William Stanley Jevons (1835–1882) English economist and logician
Source: The Principles of Science: A Treatise on Logic and Scientific Method (1874) Vol. 1, p. 14
J. Howard Moore (1862–1916)
Source: Better-World Philosophy: A Sociological Synthesis (1899), Egoism and Altruism, pp. 117–118
Jean-François Lyotard (1924–1998) French philosopher
Source: The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (1977), p.5
Antonio Negri book Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire
94
Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire
W. Edwards Deming (1900–1993) American professor, author, and consultant
The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education (1993)
“Contemplation is to knowledge, what digestion is to food – the way to get life out of it.”
Tryon Edwards (1809–1894) American theologian
Source: A Dictionary of Thoughts, 1891, p. 86.
Robert M. Pirsig book Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance
Source: Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance (1974), Ch. 29
G. I. Gurdjieff (1866–1949) influential spiritual teacher, Armenian philosopher, composer and writer
In Search of the Miraculous (1949)
Context: Objective knowledge, the idea of unity included, belongs to objective consciousness. The forms which express this knowledge when perceived by subjective consciousness are inevitably distorted and, instead of truth, they create more and more delusions. With objective consciousness it is possible to see and feel the unity of everything. But for subjective consciousness the world is split up into millions of separate and unconnected phenomena. Attempts to connect these phenomena into some sort of system in a scientific or philosophical way lead to nothing because man cannot reconstruct the idea of the whole starting from separate facts and they cannot divine the principles of the division of the whole without knowing the laws upon which this division is based.