Anatol Rapoport (1911–2007) Russian-born American mathematical psychologist
(1951, p. 14)
1950s, "What is Semantics?", 1950
Source: Essai de semantique, 1897, p. 9 ; as cited in: Schaff (1962:3).
Anatol Rapoport (1911–2007) Russian-born American mathematical psychologist
(1951, p. 14)
1950s, "What is Semantics?", 1950
Adam Schaff (1913–2006) Polish Marxist philosopher and theorist
Source: Introduction to semantics, 1962, p. 4
Adam Schaff (1913–2006) Polish Marxist philosopher and theorist
Source: Introduction to semantics, 1962, p. 4
Émile Durkheim book The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life
Source: The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, 1912, p. 10
Ferdinand de Saussure book Course in General Linguistics
Source: Cours de linguistique générale (1916), p. 33; as cited in: Adam Schaff (1962). Introduction to semantics, p. 9
Richard Rumelt (1942) American economist
Response to the question: "You’ve been teaching about, researching, and consulting on business and corporate strategy for 35 years. What changes have you seen in that time?"
"McKinsey Quarterly interview," 2007
Mihajlo D. Mesarovic (1928) Serbian academic
Mesarovic (1964) cited in: Shatrughna P. Sinha (1991) Instant encyclopaedia of geography. 1. Introduction to geography. Mittal Publications, p. 467
Robert Gordis (1908–1992) American rabbi and theologian
"Koheleth - the Man and his World" (1955), preface, p. vii
Humberto Maturana (1928) Chilean biologist and philosopher
Source: Biology of Cognition (1970), p. 43.
“But the system which has been mentioned, is far from characterising the general policy of Nations.”
Alexander Hamilton Report on Manufactures
Report on Manufactures (1791)
Context: If the system of perfect liberty to industry and commerce were the prevailing system of nations, the arguments which dissuade a country in the predicament of the United States, from the zealous pursuits of manufactures would doubtless have great force. (...) But the system which has been mentioned, is far from characterising the general policy of Nations. The prevalent one has been regulated by an opposite spirit. The consequence of it is, that the United States are to a certain extent in the situation of a country precluded from foreign Commerce. They can indeed, without difficulty obtain from abroad the manufactured supplies, of which they are in want; but they experience numerous and very injurious impediments to the emission and vent of their own commodities. (...) In such a position of things, the United States cannot exchange with Europe on equal terms, and the want of reciprocity would render them the victim of a system, which should induce them to confine their views to Agriculture and refrain from Manufactures. A constant and increasing necessity, on their part, for the commodities of Europe, and only a partial and occasional demand for their own, in return, could not but expose them to a state of impoverishment, compared with the opulence to which their political and natural advantages authorise them to aspire.