Sheldon S. Wolin (1922–2015) American political philosopher
Sheldon Wolin, Democracy Incorporated: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism (2008), p. 66
Source: Quotes 1960s-1980s, 1970s, Government in the Future, 1970, p. 146.
Sheldon S. Wolin (1922–2015) American political philosopher
Sheldon Wolin, Democracy Incorporated: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism (2008), p. 66
Irving Kristol (1920–2009) American columnist, journalist, and writer
1970s, Two Cheers for Capitalism (1978)
Chris Hedges (1956) American journalist
Source: “ 25:13 Our Only Hope Will Come Through Rebellion http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOlg_2qAbUA” (2014)
George Jackson (activist) (1941–1971) activist, Marxist, author, member of the Black Panther Party, and co-founder of the Black Guerrilla Family
Source: Blood in My Eye (1971), p. 72
Adolf A. Berle (1895–1971) American diplomat
Source: Power Without Property, 1959, p. 73; As cited in: Martin Sicker (2002) The Political Economy of Work in the 21st Century. p. 144.
Roger Lea MacBride (1929–1995) American writer, TV producer, and politician; 1976 Libertarian Party candidate for President
A New Dawn for America : The Libertarian Challenge (1976) p. 16
Thomas Frank book What's the Matter with Kansas?
Ibid. (p. 128).
What's the Matter with Kansas? (2004)
Henry David Thoreau book Civil Disobedience
Civil Disobedience (1849)
Context: To speak practically and as a citizen, unlike those who call themselves no-government men, I ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better government. Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect, and that will be one step toward obtaining it. After all, the practical reason why, when the power is once in the hands of the people, a majority are permitted, and for a long period continue, to rule, is not because they are most likely to be in the right, nor because this seems fairest to the minority, but because they are physically the strongest. But a government in which the majority rule in all cases cannot be based on justice, even as far as men understand it. Can there not be a government in which majorities do not virtually decide right and wrong, but conscience? — in which majorities decide only those questions to which the rule of expediency is applicable? Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator? Why has every man a conscience, then? I think that we should be men first, and subjects afterward. It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right. The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think right. It is truly enough said that a corporation has no conscience; but a corporation of conscientious men is a corporation with a conscience. Law never made men a whit more just; and, by means of their respect for it, even the well-disposed are daily made the agents of injustice.
John Mortimer (1923–2009) English barrister, dramatist, screenwriter and author
Source: Where There's a Will: Thoughts on the Good Life (2003), Ch. 29 : Avoiding Utopia