John Gray (1948) British philosopher
Sweet Morality (p. 224)
The Immortalization Commission: The Strange Quest to Cheat Death (2011)
John Gray (1948) British philosopher
Sweet Morality (p. 224)
The Immortalization Commission: The Strange Quest to Cheat Death (2011)
Gustav Holst (1874–1934) English composer
Quoted in Michael Short, Gustav Holst 1874-1934: A Centenary Documentation
Dan Brown (1964) American author
"Da Vinci Code Author Dan Brown Says He Has Abandoned Christianity, but Is Not an Atheist" The Christian Post (24 Oct 2017) https://www.christianpost.com/news/da-vinci-code-author-dan-brown-says-he-has-abandoned-christianity-but-is-not-an-atheist-204122
Neil deGrasse Tyson (1958) American astrophysicist and science communicator
Global Ideas from Pluto's Challenger (May 21, 2009)
Stephen Wolfram (1959) British-American computer scientist, mathematician, physicist, writer and businessman
Stephen Wolfram: Fundamental Theory of Physics, Life, and the Universe (Sep 15, 2020)
Carl Sagan (1934–1996) American astrophysicist, cosmologist, author and science educator
Charlie Rose: An Interview with Carl Sagan http://www.charlierose.com/guest/view/4553, May 27, 1996. <br class="br">Context: Science is [... ] a way of skeptically interrogating the universe with a fine understanding of human fallibility. If we are not able to ask skeptical questions, to interrogate those who tell us that something is true, to be skeptical of those in authority, then we’re up for grabs for the next charlatan, political or religious, who comes ambling along.
Bill Nye (1955) American science educator, comedian, television host, actor, writer, scientist and former mechanical engineer
[NewsBank, 35, Associated Press, TV host decries U.S. failure to value science, math education, The Star-Ledger, Newark, New Jersey, December 10, 2000]
Carl Sagan (1934–1996) American astrophysicist, cosmologist, author and science educator
"Why We Need To Understand Science" in The Skeptical Inquirer Vol. 14, Issue 3 (Spring 1990)
Context: Science is much more than a body of knowledge. It is a way of thinking. This is central to its success. Science invites us to let the facts in, even when they don’t conform to our preconceptions. It counsels us to carry alternative hypotheses in our heads and see which ones best match the facts. It urges on us a fine balance between no-holds-barred openness to new ideas, however heretical, and the most rigorous skeptical scrutiny of everything — new ideas and established wisdom. We need wide appreciation of this kind of thinking. It works. It’s an essential tool for a democracy in an age of change. Our task is not just to train more scientists but also to deepen public understanding of science.