“Who cared whether you could change motor oil when you could snap a rottweiler’s neck in 2.8 seconds? Now there was a practical skill.”

— Kelley Armstrong , book Stolen

Source: Stolen

Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "Who cared whether you could change motor oil when you could snap a rottweiler’s neck in 2.8 seconds? Now there was a pr…" by Kelley Armstrong?

Kelley Armstrong 122

Canadian writer 1968

Related quotes

“You should be more careful. You could have broken your neck or as big as you are landed on someone and killed them. (Tory)”

Sherrilyn Kenyon (1965) Novelist

Source: Acheron

“It takes long practice, yes. You have to work. Did you think you could snap your fingers, and have it as a gift? What is worth having is worth working for.”

Philip Pullman book The Amber Spyglass

Source: The Amber Spyglass

“He looked like he could have snapped the chains that held him as easily as you might snap the ribbons on a Christmas present, but when you looked in his face, you knew he wasn't going to do anything like that.”

Stephen King book The Green Mile

The Green Mile (1996)

“You could care enough to keep a secret, but you could care enough to tell one, too.”

Deb Caletti (1963) American writer

Source: Stay

“Snap your fingers and somebody runs / You don't care how they feel just as long as they come / Got your head in the stars now you've come this far / Just who do you think you are?”

Kim Wilde (1960) English pop singer

Who do you think you are?
Love is (1992)

“You could be an unprecedented genius, you could look like George Clooney, you could have a billion dollars and you could have the social skills of Oprah and you are going nowhere in politics in this country, unless you believe in that sort of god.”

Sam Harris (1967) American author, philosopher and neuroscientist

Sam Harris in debate on ABC Nightline (23 March 2010) "Does God Have a Future?" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_kAk2Naz-A&t=1m25s
2010s
Context: The God that our neighbors believe in is essentially an invisible person. He’s a creator deity, who created the universe to have a relationship with one species of primates – lucky us. And he’s got galaxy upon galaxy to attend to, but he’s especially concerned with what we do, and he’s especially concerned with what we do while naked. He almost certainly disapproves of homosexuality. And he’s created this cosmos as a vast laboratory in which to test our powers of credulity, and the test is this: can you believe in this God on bad evidence, which is to say, on faith? And if you can, you will win an eternity of happiness after you die. And it's precisely this sort of god and this sort of scheme that you must believe in if you're going to have any kind of future in politics in this country, no matter what your gifts. You could be an unprecedented genius, you could look like George Clooney, you could have a billion dollars and you could have the social skills of Oprah and you are going nowhere in politics in this country, unless you believe in that sort of god.