The Economic Tendency of Freethought (1890)
Context: I think it can be shown that the law makes ten criminals where it restrains one. On that basis it would not, as a matter of policy merely, be an economical institution.
Attributed
“I hope, Mr. President, that we can pass a law that criminalizes flag burning and desecration.”
Senate Session https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4633289/senator-hillary-rodham-clinton-protects-united-states-flag-june-27-2006 (27 June 2006)
Senate years (2001 – January 19, 2007)
Young and others v. The King (1789), 3 T. R. 102.
" 'Intellectual disobedience' and the future of copyright: Nina Paley interviewed at Foo (2012) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcJqxIyFv4s#t=4m25s" <!-- Retrieved 27 February 2013 -->
Context: In ten years I think the [copyright] laws are going to be worse and I also think they are going to be less relevant. I mean, already the difference between the laws and people's behaviour, It's like they're different planets. I'm not hopeful for the laws changing. A lot of other people are, so maybe we will have meaningful copyright reform. I doubt it. I don't think it matters. I think the tools are available for people to create and share culture and they're going to do that and they might be doing it illegaly and at a certain point it's going to be more than the system can handle. I will say that if the power structure as it exists wants to continue they're going to have to reform because it's not sustainable. Copyright law as it is, it's just completely out of touch with human behaviour.
“The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom.”
Second Treatise of Government, Ch. VI, sec. 57
Two Treatises of Government (1689)
Context: The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom. For in all the states of created beings, capable of laws, where there is no law there is no freedom.
Eagleton v. East India Co. (1802), 3 Bos. and Pull. 67.
“I think you're a damn war criminal and you should be tried as one.”
To Slobodan Milosevic. Page 266.
2000s, Promises to Keep (2008)
when interviewed by Charlie Rose, July 1998 video of the entire interview https://charlierose.com/videos/17662
Indian contemporary artists have not reached my standard: SH Raza
Speech at the Audubon Ballroom in Harlem (13 December 1964), later published in Malcolm X Speaks: Selected Speeches and Statements (1965), edited by George Breitman, p. 93
Context: The press is so powerful in its image-making role, it can make the criminal look like he's a the victim and make the victim look like he's the criminal. This is the press, an irresponsible press. It will make the criminal look like he's the victim and make the victim look like he's the criminal. If you aren't careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.
If you aren't careful, because I've seen some of you caught in that bag, you run away hating yourself and loving the man — while you're catching hell from the man. You let the man maneuver you into thinking that it's wrong to fight him when he's fighting you. He's fighting you in the morning, fighting you in the noon, fighting you at night and fighting you all in between, and you still think it's wrong to fight him back. Why? The press. The newspapers make you look wrong.
