Source: Autobiography (1873), Ch. 7: General View of the Remainder of My Life (p. 206)
“What I would like to show is that there is a vital dimension of their writing, which I call performative reflexivity, which if ignored or misunderstood will impede an adequate response to it.”
Source: Philosophy At The Limit (1990), Chapter 8, Performative Reflexivity, p. 134
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Do you have more details about the quote "What I would like to show is that there is a vital dimension of their writing, which I call performative reflexivity, w…" by David Wood?
David Wood 17
British philosopher, born 1946 1946Related quotes
Source: One-Dimensional Man (1964), p. 62
Koenraad Elst
(1959) orientalist, writer
Source: 2000s, Decolonizing the Hindu Mind (2001), p. 73-74
Antonin Artaud
(1896–1948) French-Occitanian poet, playwright, actor and theatre director
Source: Selected Writings
Miguel de Unamuno
(1864–1936) 19th-20th century Spanish writer and philosopher
The Tragic Sense of Life (1913), II : The Starting-Point
“As humans, we reflexively reject arguments that contradict what we would like to be true.”
Greg Craven
American teacher and writer
Source: What's the Worst That Could Happen?: A Rational Response to the Climate Change Debate (2009), Chapter 3 "Our Glitchy Brains" (p. 74)
Simone Weil
(1909–1943) French philosopher, Christian mystic, and social activist
Source: Simone Weil : An Anthology (1986), The Power of Words (1937), p. 224
Context: What a country calls its vital economic interests are not the things which enable its citizens to live, but the things which enable it to make war; petrol is much more likely than wheat to be a cause of international conflict. Thus when war is waged it is for the purpose of safeguarding or increasing one's capacity to make war. International politics are wholly involved in this vicious cycle. What is called national prestige consists in behaving always in such a way as to demoralize other nations by giving them the impression that, if it comes to war, one would certainly defeat them. What is called national security is an imaginary state of affairs in which one would retain the capacity to make war while depriving all other countries of it. It amounts to this, that a self-respecting nation is ready for anything, including war, except for a renunciation of its option to make war. But why is it so essential to be able to make war? No one knows, any more than the Trojans knew why it was necessary for them to keep Helen. That is why the good intentions of peace-loving statesman are so ineffectual. If the countries were divided by a real opposition of interests, it would be possible to arrive at a satisfactory compromise. But when economic and political interests have no meaning apart from war, how can they be peacefully reconciled?
George Soros
(1930) Hungarian-American business magnate, investor, and philanthropist
The Alchemy of Finance: Reading the mind of the Market (1987)
Henri Matisse
(1869–1954) French artist
Source: 1905 - 1910, Notes d'un Peintre' (Notes of a Painter) (1908), p. 410
Kevin Henkes
(1960) American children's illustrator and writer
Some Kids' Books Are Worth The Wait: 'They Do Take Time,' Says Kevin Henkes https://www.npr.org/2015/09/22/442521229/some-kids-books-are-worth-the-wait-they-do-take-time-says-kevin-henkes (September 22, 2015)