“In a criminal proceeding the question is not alone whether substantial justice has been done, but whether justice has been done according to law. All proceedings in poenam are, it need scarcely be observed, strictissimi juris; nor should it be forgotten that the formalities of law, though here and there they may lead to the escape of an offender, are intended on the whole to insure the safe administration of justice and the protection of innocence, and must be observed. A party accused has the right to insist on them as matter of right, of which he cannot be deprived against his will; and the Judge must see that they are followed.”
Martin v. Mackonochie (1878), L. R. 3 Q. B. 775.
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Sir Alexander Cockburn, 12th Baronet13
Lord Chief Justice 1802–1880Related quotes
Nehemiah Adams (1806–1878) Massachusetts clergyman
Source: Dictionary of Burning Words of Brilliant Writers (1895), P. 268.
Edwin Muir (1887–1959) British poet, novelist and translator
The Brothers (1983)
Frederick Douglass (1818–1895) American social reformer, orator, writer and statesman
Speech http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/the-nations-problem/ (June 1888). <br class="br">1880s
Lysander Spooner (1808–1887) Anarchist, Entrepreneur, Abolitionist
An Essay on the Trial by Jury, Boston, MA: John P. Jewett and Company, Cleveland, Ohio: Jewett, Proctor & Worthington (1852) p. 5
Lloyd Kenyon, 1st Baron Kenyon (1732–1802) British Baron
Wakefield's Case (1799), 27 How. St. Tr. 736.
Jakaya Kikwete (1950) Tanzanian politician and president
His backing for Sudan's President Omar Bashir, 2008-09-09 http://ippmedia.com/ipp/guardian/2008/09/09/122209.html <br class="br">2008
Aung San Suu Kyi (1945) State Counsellor of Myanmar and Leader of the National League for Democracy
In Quest of Democracy (1991)
Context: The words 'law and order' have so frequently been misused as an excuse for oppression that the very phrase has become suspect in countries which have known authoritarian rule. [... ] There is no intrinsic virtue to law and order unless 'law' is equated with justice and 'order' with the discipline of a people satisfied that justice has been done. Law as an instrument of state oppression is a familiar feature of totalitarianism. Without a popularly elected legislature and an independent judiciary to ensure due process, the authorities can enforce as 'law' arbitrary decrees that are in fact flagrant negations of all acceptable norms of justice. There can be no security for citizens in a state where new 'laws' can be made and old ones changed to suit the convenience of the powers that be. The iniquity of such practices is traditionally recognized by the precept that existing laws should not be set aside at will.