
“We can afford no liberties with liberty itself.”
United States v. Spector, 343 US 169, 180 (1952) (dissenting)
Judicial opinions
In Ladies Home Journal, May 1958
“We can afford no liberties with liberty itself.”
United States v. Spector, 343 US 169, 180 (1952) (dissenting)
Judicial opinions
Source: The Whig Interpretation of History (1931)
"In Defense of Vick, Man is the Only Top Dog," http://www.ocregister.com/opinion/rights-animals-peta-1836739-human-moral Orange County Register, September 2, 2007.
2000s, 2007
Source: Freedom, Loyalty, Dissent (1954), p. 77
2000s, 2005, Second Inaugural Address (January 2005)
“By the word "liberty" they meant liberty for property, not liberty for persons.”
Source: Money And Class In America (1989), Chapter 2, Protocols of Wealth, p. 33
“Liberty is not collective, it is personal. All liberty is individual liberty.”
1920s, Authority and Religious Liberty (1924)
Context: The Constitution and laws of our country are adopted and enacted through the direct action of the people, or through their duly chosen representatives. They reflect the enlightened conscience of our country. They ought always to speak with the true and conscientious voice of the people. Such voice has from time immemorial had the authority of divine sanction. In their great fundamentals they do not change. As new light arrives they may be altered in their details, but they represent the best that we know at any given time. To support the Constitution, to observe the laws, is to be true to our own higher nature. That is the path, and the only path, towards liberty. To resist them and violate them is to become enemies to ourselves and instruments of our own destruction. That is the path towards servitude. Obedience is not for the protection of someone else, but for the protection of ourselves. It needs to be remembered that it has to be secured not through the action of others, but through our own actions. Liberty is not collective, it is personal. All liberty is individual liberty.
Source: I. Asimov: A Memoir (1994), p. 308
Context: He always pictured himself a libertarian, which to my way of thinking means "I want the liberty to grow rich and you can have the liberty to starve". It's easy to believe that no one should depend on society for help when you yourself happen not to need such help.
“Whether in chains or in laurels, Liberty knows nothing but victories.”
1850s, Lecture at Brooklyn (1859)