“Interview, The New York Times, 1983”
Original
I dig Doris Day.
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Sarah Vaughan 8
American jazz singer 1924–1990Related quotes
“The L. A. Times, it's an anti-Christian publication, as is the New York Times.”
The New Yorker September 15 2003.
“I prefer news without interviews to interviews without news.”
Useless Interviews http://www.hicsuntleones.co.uk/2007/11/useless-interviews.html, Hic Sunt Leones, 22/11/2007
“New York is basically a new version of York. But York just got a cathedral…”
Radio 2 Show (2007–2008)
“New York, New York. Big city of dreams, but everything in New York ain't always what it seems.”
http://twitter.com/DJ_AM/status/3543399699 Last Twitter posting by DJ AM
August 25, 2009
When the Cathedrals Were White http://books.google.com/books?id=TzwVAAAAMAAJ&q="A+hundred+times+I+have+thought+New+York+is+a+catastrophe+and+fifty+times+it+is+a+beautiful+catastrophe"#search_anchor (1947)
Attributed from posthumous publications
“"Letters to the Times: Mrs. Nhu Defends Stand", The New York Times, 14 August 1963”
References
“Lewis is a former New York Times columnist and an authority on the U. S. Constitution.”
[John F., Hagan, November 22, 2003, Americans being denied rights since 9/11, journalist declares, The Plain Dealer, Cleveland, Ohio, B2]
About
“… I am a New York designer and the things are made in New York…”
New York Times Interview (November 11, 2010)
“Similarly, if an editorial writer for the New York Times were to start, say, telling the truth”
Quotes 1990s, 1990-1994, Interview by Adam Jones, 1990
Context: Boards of Directors have to make certain kinds of decisions, and those decisions are pretty narrowly constrained. They have to be committed to increasing profit share and market share. That means they're going to be forced to try to limit wages, to limit quality, to use advertising in a way that sells goods even if the product is lousy. Who tells them to do this? Nobody. But if they stopped doing it, they'd be out of business. Similarly, if an editorial writer for the New York Times were to start, say, telling the truth about the Panama invasion -- which is almost inconceivable, because to become an editorial writer you'd already have gone through a filtering process which would weed out the non-conformists -- well, the first thing that would happen is you'd start getting a lot of angry phone calls from investors, owners, and other sectors of power. That would probably suffice. If it didn't, you'd simply see the stock start falling. And if they continued with it systematically, the New York Times would be replaced by some other organ. After all, what is the New York Times? It's just a corporation. If investors and advertisers don't want to support it, and the government doesn't want to give it the special privileges and advantages that make it a "newspaper of record," it's out of business.