Mohammad Mosaddegh (1882–1967) Prime Minister of Iran
Refusing to allow the International Court in the Hague to rule on his nationalisation of oil interests
Leech v. North Staffordshire Railway Co. (1860), 29 L. J. M. C. 155.
Mohammad Mosaddegh (1882–1967) Prime Minister of Iran
Refusing to allow the International Court in the Hague to rule on his nationalisation of oil interests
“Mob rule cannot be allowed to override the decisions of our courts.”
Dwight D. Eisenhower (1890–1969) American general and politician, 34th president of the United States (in office from 1953 to 1961)
1950s, Address to the American People on the Situation in Little Rock (1957)
Nicolas Bratza (1945) British judge
"Britain should be defending European justice, not attacking it", The Independent, Tuesday 24 January 2012 http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/nicolas-bratza-britain-should-be-defending-european-justice-not-attacking-it-6293689.html
Arthur Kekewich (1832–1907) British judge
Evans v. Manchester, &c. Rail. Co. (1887), L. J. (N. S.) 57 C. D. 157.
Ronald Reagan (1911–2004) American politician, 40th president of the United States (in office from 1981 to 1989)
1980s, First term of office (1981–1985), Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation (1983)
Francis Escudero (1969) Filipino politician
Escudero, F. [Francis]. (2016, March 8). Retrieved from Official Facebook Page of Francis Escudero https://www.facebook.com/senchizescudero/posts/10153924021225610/ <br class="br">2016, Facebook
Antonin Scalia (1936–2016) former Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990).
1990s
Joe Biden (1942) 47th Vice President of the United States (in office from 2009 to 2017)
Biden reacts to leaked draft Supreme Court opinion on abortion https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/biden-reacts-leaked-draft-supreme-court-opinion-abortion/story?id=84467397 <br class="br">2022, May 2022
“For the truth of the conclusions of physical science, observation is the supreme Court of Appeal.”
Arthur Stanley Eddington (1882–1944) British astrophysicist
The Philosophy of Physical Science (1938)
Context: For the truth of the conclusions of physical science, observation is the supreme Court of Appeal. It does not follow that every item which we confidently accept as physical knowledge has actually been certified by the Court; our confidence is that it would be certified by the Court if it were submitted. But it does follow that every item of physical knowledge is of a form which might be submitted to the Court. It must be such that we can specify (although it may be impracticable to carry out) an observational procedure which would decide whether it is true or not. Clearly a statement cannot be tested by observation unless it is an assertion about the results of observation. Every item of physical knowledge must therefore be an assertion of what has been or would be the result of carrying out a specified observational procedure. <!-- p. 9