“If the author is so interested in Science, why doesn't she take a course in it?”

—  Peg Bracken

I Didn't Come Here to Argue (1969), Fawcett Crest edition, page 49.

Adopted from Wikiquote. Last update June 3, 2021. History

Help us to complete the source, original and additional information

Do you have more details about the quote "If the author is so interested in Science, why doesn't she take a course in it?" by Peg Bracken?
Peg Bracken photo
Peg Bracken 8
American writer 1918–2007

Related quotes

Stephen Fry photo
Jane Roberts photo
Abraham Pais photo

“Deliberately or not, every author is of course present in every book he or she writes — even in a scientific text.”

Abraham Pais (1918–2000) American Physicist

Prologue, p. xv
A Tale of Two Continents (1997)

E. M. S. Namboodiripad photo

“The author has accused her own mother of indulging in deviant sexuality. Yet, Mary Roy takes pride in the "beautiful work" by her daughter. "Why is it so?"”

E. M. S. Namboodiripad (1909–1998) Indian politician

Above quotes on Arundhati Roy’s novel "The God of Small Things" in which she had criticized E.M.S. cited in EMS attacks literary content of Arundhati Roy's novel, 29 November 1997, 13 December 2013, Rediff.com http://www.rediff.com/news/nov/29roy.htm,

Agatha Christie photo

“It is completely unimportant. That is why it is so interesting.”

Source: The Murder of Roger Ackroyd

Kanye West photo
Carolee Schneemann photo

“The female nude is part of a revered tradition, although she is not to take authority over depictions of her nudity. She is just to be available.”

Carolee Schneemann (1939–2019) American photographer, performance artist, and video artist

Source: Carolee Scheenmann quotes, guardian, March 8, 2019 https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2014/mar/10/carole-schneemann-naked-art-performance,

Noam Chomsky photo

“If you take an economics or a political science course, you're taught that humans are supposed to be rational wealth accumulators”

Noam Chomsky (1928) american linguist, philosopher and activist

Interview by Yifat Susskind, August 2001 http://www.madre.org/articles/chomsky-0801.html.
Quotes 2000s, 2001
Context: Take the Kyoto Protocol. Destruction of the environment is not only rational; it's exactly what you're taught to do in college. If you take an economics or a political science course, you're taught that humans are supposed to be rational wealth accumulators, each acting as an individual to maximize his own wealth in the market. The market is regarded as democratic because everybody has a vote. Of course, some have more votes than others because your votes depend on the number of dollars you have, but everybody participates and therefore it's called democratic. Well, suppose that we believe what we are taught. It follows that if there are dollars to be made, you destroy the environment. The reason is elementary. The people who are going to be harmed by this are your grandchildren, and they don't have any votes in the market. Their interests are worth zero. Anybody that pays attention to their grandchildren's interests is being irrational, because what you're supposed to do is maximize your own interests, measured by wealth, right now. Nothing else matters. So destroying the environment and militarizing outer space are rational policies, but within a framework of institutional lunacy. If you accept the institutional lunacy, then the policies are rational.

Ray Comfort photo

Related topics