“If the author is so interested in Science, why doesn't she take a course in it?”
I Didn't Come Here to Argue (1969), Fawcett Crest edition, page 49.
Help us to complete the source, original and additional information
Peg Bracken 8
American writer 1918–2007Related quotes

Source: The God of Jane: A Psychic Manifesto (1981), p. 127

Above quotes on Arundhati Roy’s novel "The God of Small Things" in which she had criticized E.M.S. cited in EMS attacks literary content of Arundhati Roy's novel, 29 November 1997, 13 December 2013, Rediff.com http://www.rediff.com/news/nov/29roy.htm,

“It is completely unimportant. That is why it is so interesting.”
Source: The Murder of Roger Ackroyd

Source: Carolee Scheenmann quotes, guardian, March 8, 2019 https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2014/mar/10/carole-schneemann-naked-art-performance,

Interview by Yifat Susskind, August 2001 http://www.madre.org/articles/chomsky-0801.html.
Quotes 2000s, 2001
Context: Take the Kyoto Protocol. Destruction of the environment is not only rational; it's exactly what you're taught to do in college. If you take an economics or a political science course, you're taught that humans are supposed to be rational wealth accumulators, each acting as an individual to maximize his own wealth in the market. The market is regarded as democratic because everybody has a vote. Of course, some have more votes than others because your votes depend on the number of dollars you have, but everybody participates and therefore it's called democratic. Well, suppose that we believe what we are taught. It follows that if there are dollars to be made, you destroy the environment. The reason is elementary. The people who are going to be harmed by this are your grandchildren, and they don't have any votes in the market. Their interests are worth zero. Anybody that pays attention to their grandchildren's interests is being irrational, because what you're supposed to do is maximize your own interests, measured by wealth, right now. Nothing else matters. So destroying the environment and militarizing outer space are rational policies, but within a framework of institutional lunacy. If you accept the institutional lunacy, then the policies are rational.
Source: Cold Mountain

Cults, Sects and Questions (c. 1979)