John Austin (legal philosopher) (1790–1859) legal philosopher
Source: The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (1832), p. 224
Proposals for a New Law Code (1768)
John Austin (legal philosopher) (1790–1859) legal philosopher
Source: The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (1832), p. 224
“We ought to consider what is the end of government, before we determine which is the best form.”
John Adams (1735–1826) 2nd President of the United States
1770s, Thoughts on Government (1776)
Context: We ought to consider what is the end of government, before we determine which is the best form. Upon this point all speculative politicians will agree, that the happiness of society is the end of government, as all Divines and moral Philosophers will agree that the happiness of the individual is the end of man. From this principle it will follow, that the form of government which communicates ease, comfort, security, or, in one word, happiness, to the greatest number of persons, and in the greatest degree, is the best.
Denis Diderot (1713–1784) French Enlightenment philosopher and encyclopædist
Article on Government
L'Encyclopédie (1751-1766)
Frances Power Cobbe (1822–1904) Irish writer, social reformer, anti-vivisection activist and leading suffragette
Lecture I, p. 23
The Duties of Women (1881)
Joshua Reynolds (1723–1792) English painter, specialising in portraits
Discourse no. 13; vol. 2, p. 136.
Discourses on Art
Calvin Coolidge (1872–1933) American politician, 30th president of the United States (in office from 1923 to 1929)
1920s, Authority and Religious Liberty (1924)
Michael J. Sandel (1953) American political philosopher
The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self, 1984
Samuel Adams (1722–1803) American statesman, Massachusetts governor, and political philosopher
The Rights of the Colonists (1772)
Context: The natural liberty of man, by entering into society, is abridged or restrained, so far only as is necessary for the great end of society, the best good of the whole. In the state of nature every man is, under God, judge and sole judge of his own rights and of the injuries done him. By entering into society he agrees to an arbiter or indifferent judge between him and his neighbors; but he no more renounces his original right than by taking a cause out of the ordinary course of law, and leaving the decision to referees or indifferent arbitrators. In the last case, he must pay the referees for time and trouble. He should also be willing to pay his just quota for the support of government, the law, and the constitution; the end of which is to furnish indifferent and impartial judges in all cases that may happen, whether civil, ecclesiastical, marine, or military.
Chester Barnard book The Functions of the Executive
Source: The Functions of the Executive (1938), p. 19 (in 1968 edition)