Wernher von Braun citations

Wernher Magnus Maximilian von Braun est un ingénieur allemand, Sturmbannführer SS durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, naturalisé américain en 1955 qui a joué un rôle majeur dans le développement des fusées.

En 1930 alors âgé de 18 ans Wernher von Braun rejoint un groupe de passionnés d'astronautique qui au sein de la Verein für Raumschiffahrt met au point de petites fusées expérimentales. Pour poursuivre ses travaux de recherche sur la propulsion à ergols liquides, il accepte de rallier en 1932 le département balistique de la Direction des Armements de l'armée allemande dirigé par Walter Dornberger. Au sein de cette institution militaire, il prend la tête d'un programme de recherche sur les fusées à propulsion à ergols liquides, qui bénéficie d'un soutien financier croissant des dirigeants militaires allemands dans le contexte d'une politique de réarmement de l'Allemagne portée par l'arrivée au pouvoir d'Adolf Hitler. Grâce à ses talents d'organisateur et ses compétences techniques, son équipe d'ingénieurs met au point des fusées de puissance croissante allant de l'A1 à l'A4. Cette dernière, d'une masse de 13 tonnes et dotée d'une portée de plus de 300 km, est conçue dès le départ pour servir de missile balistique avec une charge militaire de plus de 800 kg. Elle effectue son premier vol en 1942 et constitue une avancée majeure par rapport à toutes les fusées développées jusque-là. Sous l'appellation V2 le missile est lancé depuis des rampes mobiles à plusieurs milliers d'exemplaires sur les populations civiles des pays Alliés au cours des deux dernières années de la Seconde Guerre mondiale mais manquant à la fois de précision et de puissance de frappe n'a aucune influence sur le cours de la guerre.

Wernher von Braun est récupéré après la défaite allemande avec les principaux ingénieurs ayant participé au projet V2 par les forces américaines dans le cadre de l'opération Paperclip. Il est placé à la tête d'une équipe constituée principalement d'ingénieurs allemands. Au début des années 1950 l'équipe de von Braun est installée à Huntsville où elle développe les premiers missiles balistiques de l'armée de terre américaine. Lorsque la course à l'espace est lancée à la fin des années 1950, c'est la fusée Juno I, développée par ses équipes, qui place en orbite le premier satellite artificiel américain Explorer 1. Spécialiste reconnu des lanceurs, il devient responsable du Centre de vol spatial Marshall créé par l'agence spatiale américaine pour développer la famille de fusées Saturn. Il joue un rôle pivot dans le développement du lanceur Saturn V qui permettra le lancement des missions lunaires du programme Apollo. À la suite de la réduction du budget alloué au programme spatial américain, il quitte la NASA pour le secteur privé en 1972.

Von Braun a eu une relation complexe et ambivalente avec le régime nazi. Il est pour certains hauts dirigeants un modèle et joue un rôle important sans état d'âme dans l'effort de guerre allemand. Il est par ailleurs impossible qu'il ait pu ignorer les conditions de travail inhumaines des déportés chargés de construire les V2 dans les tunnels de Dora, qui ont conduit au décès de milliers d'entre eux.

✵ 23. mars 1912 – 16. juin 1977
Wernher von Braun photo
Wernher von Braun: 22   citations 0   J'aime

Wernher von Braun: Citations en anglais

“What we are seeking in tomorrow's trip is indeed that key to our future on earth. We are expanding the mind of man. We are extending this God-given brain and these God-given hands to their outermost limits and in so doing all mankind will benefit. All mankind will reap the harvest.”

Banquet speech on the eve of the Apollo 11 launch, Royal Oaks Country Club, Titusville (15 July 1969); quoted in "Of a Fire on the Moon", LIFEmagazine (29 August 1969), 67, No. 9, p. 34
Contexte: If our intention had been merely to bring back a handful of soil and rocks from the lunar gravel pit and then forget the whole thing, we would certainly be history's biggest fools. But that is not our intention now — it never will be. What we are seeking in tomorrow's trip is indeed that key to our future on earth. We are expanding the mind of man. We are extending this God-given brain and these God-given hands to their outermost limits and in so doing all mankind will benefit. All mankind will reap the harvest. … What we will have attained when Neil Armstrong steps down upon the moon is a completely new step in the evolution of man.

“Today we live in a different world because in 1958 Americans accepted the challenge of space and made the required national investment to meet it.”

Responsible Scientific Investigation and Application (1976)
Contexte: Without wanting to seem overly partisan, I would like simply to point out that the space program has by all standards become America's greatest generator of new ideas in science and technology. It is essentially an organization for opening new frontiers, physically and intellectually. Today we live in a different world because in 1958 Americans accepted the challenge of space and made the required national investment to meet it.
Young people today are learning a new science, but even more importantly, they are viewing the earth and man's relationship to it quite differently — and I think perhaps more humanly — than we did fifteen years ago. The space program is the first large scientific and technological activity in history that offers to bring the people of all nations together instead of setting them further apart.

“One of the most disconcerting issues of our time lies in the fact that modern science, along with miracle drugs and communications satellites, has also produced nuclear bombs.”

Comparable to remarks of William Masters, in "Two Sex Researchers on the Firing Line" LIFE magazine (24 June 1966), p. 49: "Science by itself has no moral dimension. But it does seek to establish truth. And upon this truth morality can be built."
Variants:
Science does not have a moral dimension. It is like a knife. If you give it to a surgeon or a murderer, each will use it differently.
As quoted in Futurehype: The Myths of Technology Change (2009) by Robert B. Seidensticker
Science does not have a moral dimension. It is like a knife. If you give it to a surgeon or a murderer, each will use it differently. Should the knife have not been developed?
As quoted in Science & Society (2012) by Peter Daempfle, Ch. 6, p. 97<!-- also in Good Science, Bad Science, Pseudoscience, and Just Plain Bunk: How to Tell the Difference (2013) by Peter Daempfle, Ch. 9, p. 166 -->
Responsible Scientific Investigation and Application (1976)
Contexte: One of the most disconcerting issues of our time lies in the fact that modern science, along with miracle drugs and communications satellites, has also produced nuclear bombs. What makes it even worse, science has utterly failed to provide an answer on how to cope with them. As a result, science and scientists have often been blamed for the desperate dilemma in which mankind finds itself today.
Science, all by itself, has no moral dimension. The same poison-containing drug which cures when taken in small doses, may kill when taken in excess. The same nuclear chain reaction that produces badly needed electrical energy when harnessed in a reactor, may kill thousands when abruptly released in an atomic bomb. Thus it does not make sense to ask a biochemist or a nuclear physicist whether his research in the field of toxic substances or nuclear processes is good or bad for mankind. In most cases the scientist will be fully aware of the possibility of an abuse of his discoveries, but aside from his innate scientific curiosity he will be motivated by a deep-seated hope and belief that something of value for his fellow man may emerge from his labors.
The same applies to technology, through which most advances in the natural sciences are put to practical use.

“I would like simply to point out that the space program has by all standards become America's greatest generator of new ideas in science and technology.”

Responsible Scientific Investigation and Application (1976)
Contexte: Without wanting to seem overly partisan, I would like simply to point out that the space program has by all standards become America's greatest generator of new ideas in science and technology. It is essentially an organization for opening new frontiers, physically and intellectually. Today we live in a different world because in 1958 Americans accepted the challenge of space and made the required national investment to meet it.
Young people today are learning a new science, but even more importantly, they are viewing the earth and man's relationship to it quite differently — and I think perhaps more humanly — than we did fifteen years ago. The space program is the first large scientific and technological activity in history that offers to bring the people of all nations together instead of setting them further apart.

“In most cases the scientist will be fully aware of the possibility of an abuse of his discoveries, but aside from his innate scientific curiosity he will be motivated by a deep-seated hope and belief that something of value for his fellow man may emerge from his labors.”

Comparable to remarks of William Masters, in "Two Sex Researchers on the Firing Line" LIFE magazine (24 June 1966), p. 49: "Science by itself has no moral dimension. But it does seek to establish truth. And upon this truth morality can be built."
Variants:
Science does not have a moral dimension. It is like a knife. If you give it to a surgeon or a murderer, each will use it differently.
As quoted in Futurehype: The Myths of Technology Change (2009) by Robert B. Seidensticker
Science does not have a moral dimension. It is like a knife. If you give it to a surgeon or a murderer, each will use it differently. Should the knife have not been developed?
As quoted in Science & Society (2012) by Peter Daempfle, Ch. 6, p. 97<!-- also in Good Science, Bad Science, Pseudoscience, and Just Plain Bunk: How to Tell the Difference (2013) by Peter Daempfle, Ch. 9, p. 166 -->
Responsible Scientific Investigation and Application (1976)
Contexte: One of the most disconcerting issues of our time lies in the fact that modern science, along with miracle drugs and communications satellites, has also produced nuclear bombs. What makes it even worse, science has utterly failed to provide an answer on how to cope with them. As a result, science and scientists have often been blamed for the desperate dilemma in which mankind finds itself today.
Science, all by itself, has no moral dimension. The same poison-containing drug which cures when taken in small doses, may kill when taken in excess. The same nuclear chain reaction that produces badly needed electrical energy when harnessed in a reactor, may kill thousands when abruptly released in an atomic bomb. Thus it does not make sense to ask a biochemist or a nuclear physicist whether his research in the field of toxic substances or nuclear processes is good or bad for mankind. In most cases the scientist will be fully aware of the possibility of an abuse of his discoveries, but aside from his innate scientific curiosity he will be motivated by a deep-seated hope and belief that something of value for his fellow man may emerge from his labors.
The same applies to technology, through which most advances in the natural sciences are put to practical use.

“The space program is the first large scientific and technological activity in history that offers to bring the people of all nations together instead of setting them further apart.”

Responsible Scientific Investigation and Application (1976)
Contexte: Without wanting to seem overly partisan, I would like simply to point out that the space program has by all standards become America's greatest generator of new ideas in science and technology. It is essentially an organization for opening new frontiers, physically and intellectually. Today we live in a different world because in 1958 Americans accepted the challenge of space and made the required national investment to meet it.
Young people today are learning a new science, but even more importantly, they are viewing the earth and man's relationship to it quite differently — and I think perhaps more humanly — than we did fifteen years ago. The space program is the first large scientific and technological activity in history that offers to bring the people of all nations together instead of setting them further apart.

“One cannot be exposed to the law and order of the universe without concluding that there must be design and purpose behind it all.”

From a letter to the California State board of Education (14 September 1972)
Contexte: For me, the idea of a creation is not conceivable without invoking the necessity of design. One cannot be exposed to the law and order of the universe without concluding that there must be design and purpose behind it all.

“Science, all by itself, has no moral dimension. The same poison-containing drug which cures when taken in small doses, may kill when taken in excess.”

Comparable to remarks of William Masters, in "Two Sex Researchers on the Firing Line" LIFE magazine (24 June 1966), p. 49: "Science by itself has no moral dimension. But it does seek to establish truth. And upon this truth morality can be built."
Variants:
Science does not have a moral dimension. It is like a knife. If you give it to a surgeon or a murderer, each will use it differently.
As quoted in Futurehype: The Myths of Technology Change (2009) by Robert B. Seidensticker
Science does not have a moral dimension. It is like a knife. If you give it to a surgeon or a murderer, each will use it differently. Should the knife have not been developed?
As quoted in Science & Society (2012) by Peter Daempfle, Ch. 6, p. 97<!-- also in Good Science, Bad Science, Pseudoscience, and Just Plain Bunk: How to Tell the Difference (2013) by Peter Daempfle, Ch. 9, p. 166 -->
Responsible Scientific Investigation and Application (1976)
Contexte: One of the most disconcerting issues of our time lies in the fact that modern science, along with miracle drugs and communications satellites, has also produced nuclear bombs. What makes it even worse, science has utterly failed to provide an answer on how to cope with them. As a result, science and scientists have often been blamed for the desperate dilemma in which mankind finds itself today.
Science, all by itself, has no moral dimension. The same poison-containing drug which cures when taken in small doses, may kill when taken in excess. The same nuclear chain reaction that produces badly needed electrical energy when harnessed in a reactor, may kill thousands when abruptly released in an atomic bomb. Thus it does not make sense to ask a biochemist or a nuclear physicist whether his research in the field of toxic substances or nuclear processes is good or bad for mankind. In most cases the scientist will be fully aware of the possibility of an abuse of his discoveries, but aside from his innate scientific curiosity he will be motivated by a deep-seated hope and belief that something of value for his fellow man may emerge from his labors.
The same applies to technology, through which most advances in the natural sciences are put to practical use.

“Basic research is what I am doing when I don't know what I am doing.”

In an interview in the New York Times (16 December 1957), cited in a footnote on page 32 of "Work, Society, and Culture" by Yves Reni Marie Simon, and also in a footnote (in German) on page 360 of "Vita activa oder Vom taetigen Leben" by Hannah Arend (1981)

Variants:

Basic research is when I'm doing what I don't know I'm doing.

Research is what I'm doing when I don't know what I'm doing.

Basic research is what I am doing when I don't know what I am doing.

“We can lick gravity, but sometimes the paperwork is overwhelming.”

"On Bureaucracy", Chicago Sun Times (10 July 1958), as quoted in Gaither's Dictionary of Scientific Quotations, 2nd edition (2012), by Carl C. Gaither and Alma E. Cavazos-Gaither, editors, p. 925

“I'm convinced that before the year 2000 is over, the first child will have been born on the moon.”

Taped TV interview, broadcast on WMAL, Washington, (7 January 1972), as reported in "Birth of Child on Moon Foreseen by von Braun", New York Times (7 January 1972), p. 14

“The rocket worked perfectly, except for landing on the wrong planet.”

Remark to a colleague after the first V-2 rocket hit London (September 1944), as quoted in Apollo in Perspective : Spaceflight Then and Now (1999) by Jonathan Allday, p. 85

“There is just one thing I can promise you about the outer-space program: Your tax dollar will go farther.”

Attributed in Reader's Digest (1961), and The Yale Book of Quotations (2006) edited by Fred R. Shapiro, p. 101

Auteurs similaires

Nikola Tesla photo
Nikola Tesla 1
inventeur et ingénieur serbe
Erich Maria Remarque photo
Erich Maria Remarque 6
écrivain allemand
Albert Einstein photo
Albert Einstein 67
physicien allemand
Bertolt Brecht photo
Bertolt Brecht 13
dramaturge, metteur en scène, critique théâtral et poète al…
Thomas Mann photo
Thomas Mann 69
écrivain allemand
Edith Stein photo
Edith Stein 20
carmélite allemande d'origine juive, mystique, morte à Ausc…
Martin Heidegger photo
Martin Heidegger 16
philosophe allemand
Hannah Arendt photo
Hannah Arendt 27
philosophe américaine d'origine allemande
Franz Kafka photo
Franz Kafka 24
écrivain pragois de langue allemande (1883-1924)
Charles Bukowski photo
Charles Bukowski 19
écrivain américain