Richard Dawkins citations
Page 8

Richard Dawkins, né le 26 mars 1941 à Nairobi, est un biologiste et éthologiste britannique, vulgarisateur et théoricien de l'évolution, membre de la Royal Society. Professeur émérite au New College de l'université d'Oxford, Richard Dawkins est l'un des académiciens britanniques les plus célèbres.

Il acquiert la consécration avec son livre de 1976 intitulé Le Gène égoïste, qui popularise la théorie de l'évolution centrée sur les gènes et introduit le terme de « mème ». En 1982, il développe cette théorie dans son ouvrage Phénotype étendu puis publie en 2006 Pour en finir avec Dieu, vendu à plus de deux millions d'exemplaires et traduit en trente et une langues.

Vice-président de la British Humanist Association, il est reconnu comme un ardent défenseur du rationalisme, de la pensée scientifique et de l'athéisme. Il est résolument anticlérical et est aussi l'un des principaux critiques anglo-saxons du créationnisme, du dessein intelligent et des pseudo-sciences. Il s'est rendu célèbre aussi pour sa controverse amicale, mais ferme, avec son collègue Stephen Jay Gould sur la question des équilibres ponctués.

En plus de ses nombreux ouvrages scientifiques, Dawkins promeut sa vision rationnelle au travers de films et documentaires, de conférences et de débats télévisés sur les grandes radios ou chaînes nationales du monde entier. Il complète son action sur le terrain associatif en créant et dirigeant la Fondation Richard Dawkins pour la raison et la science. Wikipedia  

✵ 26. mars 1941
Richard Dawkins photo
Richard Dawkins: 330   citations 2   J'aime

Richard Dawkins citations célèbres

“Nous allons mourir, et cela fait de nous les veinards. La plupart des gens ne mourront jamais parce qu’il ne naîtront jamais. Les personnes potentielles qui auraient pu être là à ma place mais en fait ne verront jamais la lumière du jour sont plus nombreuses que les grains de sable du Sahara. Ces fantômes non nés comprennent certainement des poètes plus grands que Keats, des scientifiques plus grands que Newton. Nous savons cela parce que l’ensemble des personnes possibles permises par notre ADN dépassent si massivement l’ensemble des personnes réelles. En dépit de ces probabilités stupéfiantes c’est vous et moi, dans notre banalité, qui sommes là. Nous les quelques privilégiés qui avons gagné la loterie de la vie contre toutes les probabilités, comment osons-nous nous plaindre de notre inévitable retour à cet état précédent dont la majorité d’entre nous ne s’éveillera jamais?”

en
We are going to die, and that makes us the lucky ones. Most people are never going to die because they are never going to be born. The potential people who could have been here in my place but who will in fact never see the light of day outnumber the sand grains of Sahara. Certainly those unborn ghosts include greater poets than Keats, scientists greater than Newton. We know this because the set of possible people allowed by our DNA so massively outnumbers the set of actual people. In the teeth of these stupefying odds it is you and I, in our ordinariness, that are here. We privileged few, who won the lottery of birth against all odds, how dare we whine at our inevitable return to that prior state from which the vast majority have never stirred?
Les Mystères de l'arc-en-ciel (Unweaving the Rainbow), 1998

Richard Dawkins: Citations en anglais

“The wheel may be one of those cases where the engineering solution can be seen in plain view, yet be unattainable in evolution because it lies [on] the other side of a deep valley, cutting unbridgeably across the massif of Mount Improbable.”

[Dawkins, Richard, Richard Dawkins, Why don't animals have wheels?, Sunday Times, November 24, 1996, http://www.simonyi.ox.ac.uk/dawkins/WorldOfDawkins-archive/Dawkins/Work/Articles/1996-11-24wheels.shtml, October 29, 2008, http://web.archive.org/web/20070221073440/http://www.simonyi.ox.ac.uk/dawkins/WorldOfDawkins-archive/Dawkins/Work/Articles/1996-11-24wheels.shtml, February 21, 2007]

“Well, what if I'm wrong, I mean — anybody could be wrong. We could all be wrong about the up the mountain. There's no particular reason to pick on the Judeo-Christian god, in which by the sheerest accident you happen to have been brought up and ask me the question, "What if I'm wrong?" What if you're wrong about the great Juju at the bottom of the sea?”

Answering audience questions after a reading of The God Delusion http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mmskXXetcg,Randolph-Macon Woman's College,
Posed question: "This is probably going to be the most simplest one for you to answer, but: What if you're wrong?"

“Haven't read Koran so couldn't quote chapter & verse like I can for Bible. But often say Islam greatest force for evil today”

https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/307369895031603200 (28 February 2013)
Twitter

“Human vanity cherishes the absurd notion that our species is the final goal of evolution.”

Richard Dawkins livre The Blind Watchmaker

Source: The Blind Watchmaker (1986), Chapter 3 “Accumulating Small Change” (p. 50)

“I hate the neologism "owned" for "scored a victory over". I have no intention of owning anyone, and nobody will ever own me.”

https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/336048706853937152 (19 May 2013)
Twitter

“Don't ask God to cure cancer & world poverty. He's too busy finding you a parking space & fixing the weather for your barbecue.”

https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/358514912789676033 (20 July 2013)
Twitter

“I agree that it's very difficult to come to an absolute definition of what's moral and what is not. We are on our own, without a god, and we have to get together, sit down together and decide what kind of society do we want to live in. Do we want to live in a society where people steal, where people kill, where people don't pull their weight paying their taxes, doing that kind of thing? Do we want to live in a kind of society where everybody is out for themselves in a dog-eat-dog world? And we decide in conclave together that that's not the kind of world in which we want to live. It's difficult. There is no absolute reason why we should believe that that's true - it's a moral decision which we take as individuals - and we take it collectively as a collection of individuals. If you want to get that sort of value system from religion I want you to ask yourself - whereabouts in religion do you get it? Which religion do you get it from? They're all different. If you get it from the Judeo-Christian-Islamic tradition then I beg you - don't get it from your holy book! Because the morality you will get from reading your holy book is hideous. Don't get it from your holy book. Don't get it from sucking up to your god. Don't get it from saying “oh, I'm terrified of going to hell so I'd better be good” - that's a very ignoble reason to be good. Instead - be good for good reasons. Be good for the reason that's you've decided together with other people the society we want to live in: a decent humane society. Not one based on absolutism, not one based on holy books and not one based on sucking up to.. looking over your shoulder to the divine spy camera in the sky.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roFdPHdhgKQ&t=59m29s
Richard Dawkins vs. Jonathan Sacks - BBC's RE:Think Festival (2012)

Auteurs similaires

Terry Pratchett photo
Terry Pratchett 82
écrivain britannique
George Orwell photo
George Orwell 27
écrivain britannique
John Maynard Keynes photo
John Maynard Keynes 12
économiste britannique
Elias Canetti photo
Elias Canetti 8
écrivain britannique germanophone
Aldous Huxley photo
Aldous Huxley 43
Romancier et essayiste britannique
Winston Churchill photo
Winston Churchill 23
homme d'État britannique
Audrey Hepburn photo
Audrey Hepburn 6
actrice britannique
John Lennon photo
John Lennon 10
auteur-compositeur-interprète britannique
Ludwig Wittgenstein photo
Ludwig Wittgenstein 28
philosophe et logicien autrichien, puis britannique
Arthur Conan Doyle photo
Arthur Conan Doyle 15
écrivain et médecin écossais