Karl Popper citations
Page 3

Karl Raimund Popper est un philosophe des sciences du XXe siècle. Il critique la théorie vérificationniste de la signification et met l'accent sur l'idée de réfutabilité par l'expérimentation ou l'échange critique comme critère de démarcation entre science et pseudo-science. Rejetant la métaphysique en tant que système irréfutable, il souligne la nécessité de fonder les recherches scientifiques sur des « programmes de recherche métaphysique » et inscrit son travail dans le cadre de l'épistémologie évolutionniste.

✵ 28. juillet 1902 – 17. septembre 1994
Karl Popper photo
Karl Popper: 86   citations 0   J'aime

Karl Popper citations célèbres

Karl Popper: Citations en anglais

“Good tests kill flawed theories; we remain alive to guess again.”

As quoted in My Universe : A Transcendent Reality (2011) by Alex Vary, Part II

“We must plan for freedom, and not only for security, if for no other reason than that only freedom can make security secure.”

Karl Popper livre La Société ouverte et ses ennemis

Vol. 2, Ch. 21 "An Evaluation of the Prophecy"
The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945)

“SPAN ID=What_we_should_do> What we should do, I suggest, is to give up the idea of ultimate sources of knowledge, and admit that all knowledge is human; that it is mixed with our errors, our prejudices, our dreams, and our hopes; that all we can do is to grope for truth even though it be beyond our reach. We may admit that our groping is often inspired, but we must be on our guard against the belief, however deeply felt, that our inspiration carries any authority, divine or otherwise. If we thus admit that there is no authority beyond the reach of criticism to be found within the whole province of our knowledge, however far it may have penetrated into the unknown, then we can retain, without danger, the idea that truth is beyond human authority. And we must retain it. For without this idea there can be no objective standards of inquiry; no criticism of our conjectures; no groping for the unknown; no quest for knowledge. </SPAN”

Introduction "On The Sources of Knowledge and of Ignorance" Section XVII, p. 30 Variant translation: I believe it is worthwhile trying to discover more about the world, even if this only teaches us how little we know. It might do us good to remember from time to time that, while differing widely in the various little bits we know, in our infinite ignorance we are all equal.
If we thus admit that there is no authority beyond the reach of criticism to be found within the whole province of our knowledge, however far we may have penetrated into the unknown, then we can retain, without risk of dogmatism, the idea that truth itself is beyond all human authority. Indeed, we are not only able to retain this idea, we must retain it. For without it there can be no objective standards of scientific inquiry, no criticism of our conjectured solutions, no groping for the unknown, and no quest for knowledge.
Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (1963)

“We may become the makers of our fate when we have ceased to pose as its prophets.”

Karl Popper livre La Société ouverte et ses ennemis

Introduction
The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945)

“It seems to me certain that more people are killed out of righteous stupidity than out of wickedness.”

Source: Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (1963), p. 368

“No rational argument will have a rational effect on a man who does not want to adopt a rational attitude.”

Karl Popper livre La Société ouverte et ses ennemis

Vol. 2, Ch. 24 "Oracular Philosophy and the Revolt against Reason"
The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945)

“… The answer to this problem is: as implied by Hume, we certainly are not justified in reasoning from an instance to the truth of the corresponding law. But to this negative result a second result, equally negative, may be added: we are justified in reasoning from a counterinstance to the falsity of the corresponding universal law (that is, of any law of which it is a counterinstance). Or in other words, from a purely logical point of view, the acceptance of one counterinstance to 'All swans are white' implies the falsity of the law 'All swans are white' - that law, that is, whose counterinstance we accepted. Induction is logically invalid; but refutation or falsification is a logically valid way of arguing from a single counterinstance to - or, rather, against - the corresponding law. This shows that I continue to agree with Hume's negative logical result; but I extend it. This logical situation is completely independent of any question of whether we would, in practice, accept a single counterinstance - for example, a solitary black swan - in refutation of a so far highly successful law. I do not suggest that we would necessarily be so easily satisfied; we might well suspect that the black specimen before us was not a swan.”

Karl Popper livre The Logic of Scientific Discovery

Source: The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1934), Ch. 1 "A Survey of Some Fundamental Problems", Section I: The Problem of Induction http://dieoff.org/page126.htm p. 27

“Science may be described as the art of systematic over-simplification — the art of discerning what we may with advantage omit.”

Karl Popper livre The Open Universe

The Open Universe : An Argument for Indeterminism (1992), p. 44

“Piecemeal social engineering resembles physical engineering in regarding the ends as beyond the province of technology.”

Karl Popper livre The Poverty of Historicism

All that technology may say about ends is whether they are compatible with each other or realizable.
The Poverty of Historicism (1957) Ch. 22 The Unholy Alliance with Utopianism

“If the many, the specialists, gain the day, it will be the end of science as we know it - of great science. It will be a spiritual catastrophe comparable in its consequences to nuclear armament.”

K. Popper, The Myth of the Framework, London: Routledge. As quoted in The Cambridge Companion to Karl Popper https://books.google.it/Brooks?id=ha6yDAAQBAJ&of=PA173 (2016) by J. Shearmur, G. Stokes

“...non-reproducible single occurrences are of no significance to science.”

Karl Popper livre The Logic of Scientific Discovery

Source: The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1934), Ch. 4 "Falsifiability", Section XXII: Falsifiability and Falsification. p. 66.

“Besides, we should never attempt to balance anybody's misery against somebody else's happiness.”

Karl Popper livre Conjectures and Refutations

Source: Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (1963), pp. 486-487

“Do not allow your dreams of a beautiful world to lure you away from the claims of men who suffer here and now.”

Karl Popper livre Conjectures and Refutations

Source: Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (1963), p. 485

“Ignorance is not a simple lack of knowledge but an active aversion to knowledge, the refusal to know, issuing from cowardice, pride or laziness of mind.”

Principle attributed to Popper by Ryszard Kapiscinski in New York Times obituary, 1995.
Misattributed
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/1995/01/01/magazine/lives-well-lived-karl-popper-the-philosopher-as-giantslayer.html

Auteurs similaires

Martin Heidegger photo
Martin Heidegger 16
philosophe allemand
Friedrich Hayek photo
Friedrich Hayek 24
philosophe et économiste autrichien
Michel Foucault photo
Michel Foucault 64
philosophe français
Frank Herbert photo
Frank Herbert 24
écrivain américain, auteur de romans de science-fiction
Hannah Arendt photo
Hannah Arendt 27
philosophe américaine d'origine allemande
Ludwig Wittgenstein photo
Ludwig Wittgenstein 28
philosophe et logicien autrichien, puis britannique
Simone Weil photo
Simone Weil 77
philosophe française
Paul Valéry photo
Paul Valéry 97
écrivain, poète et philosophe français
Simone de Beauvoir photo
Simone de Beauvoir 76
philosophe, romancière, épistolière, mémorialiste et essayi…
Bertrand Russell photo
Bertrand Russell 20
mathématicien, logicien, philosophe, épistémologue, homme p…