Richard Dawkins idézet
oldal 8

Clinton Richard Dawkins brit etológus, evolúciós biológus és népszerű tudományos író. 1995-től 2008-ig az Oxfordi Egyetemen Charles Simonyi által létrehozott Tudomány-népszerűsítő Tanszék vezetője. A Royal Society tagja, aktív ateista, műveiben gyakran foglalkozik vallási kérdésekkel. Hírnevét 1976-ban Az önző gén című könyvével alapozta meg, amelyben ismertette a géncentrikus evolúció lényegét és annak utolsó fejezetével megalkotta a memetika alapjait. Ezt követte 1982-ben A hódító gén. Gyakori vitapartner televíziós és rádiós műsorokban főként evolúciós biológiai, kreacionizmussal kapcsolatos és vallási témákban.

Emellett lelkes szekuláris humanista, szkeptikus és a Brights Mozgalom kiemelkedő alakja. Wikipedia  

✵ 26. március 1941
Richard Dawkins fénykép
Richard Dawkins: 329   idézetek 0   Kedvelés

Richard Dawkins híres idézetei

„Az önző gén”

Művei

„A hódító gén”

Művei

„Isteni téveszme”

Művei

Richard Dawkins: Idézetek angolul

“The wheel may be one of those cases where the engineering solution can be seen in plain view, yet be unattainable in evolution because it lies [on] the other side of a deep valley, cutting unbridgeably across the massif of Mount Improbable.”

[Dawkins, Richard, Richard Dawkins, Why don't animals have wheels?, Sunday Times, November 24, 1996, http://www.simonyi.ox.ac.uk/dawkins/WorldOfDawkins-archive/Dawkins/Work/Articles/1996-11-24wheels.shtml, October 29, 2008, http://web.archive.org/web/20070221073440/http://www.simonyi.ox.ac.uk/dawkins/WorldOfDawkins-archive/Dawkins/Work/Articles/1996-11-24wheels.shtml, February 21, 2007]

“Well, what if I'm wrong, I mean — anybody could be wrong. We could all be wrong about the up the mountain. There's no particular reason to pick on the Judeo-Christian god, in which by the sheerest accident you happen to have been brought up and ask me the question, "What if I'm wrong?" What if you're wrong about the great Juju at the bottom of the sea?”

Answering audience questions after a reading of The God Delusion http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mmskXXetcg,Randolph-Macon Woman's College,
Posed question: "This is probably going to be the most simplest one for you to answer, but: What if you're wrong?"

“Haven't read Koran so couldn't quote chapter & verse like I can for Bible. But often say Islam greatest force for evil today”

https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/307369895031603200 (28 February 2013)
Twitter

“Human vanity cherishes the absurd notion that our species is the final goal of evolution.”

Richard Dawkins könyv The Blind Watchmaker

Forrás: The Blind Watchmaker (1986), Chapter 3 “Accumulating Small Change” (p. 50)

“I hate the neologism "owned" for "scored a victory over". I have no intention of owning anyone, and nobody will ever own me.”

https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/336048706853937152 (19 May 2013)
Twitter

“Don't ask God to cure cancer & world poverty. He's too busy finding you a parking space & fixing the weather for your barbecue.”

https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/358514912789676033 (20 July 2013)
Twitter

“I agree that it's very difficult to come to an absolute definition of what's moral and what is not. We are on our own, without a god, and we have to get together, sit down together and decide what kind of society do we want to live in. Do we want to live in a society where people steal, where people kill, where people don't pull their weight paying their taxes, doing that kind of thing? Do we want to live in a kind of society where everybody is out for themselves in a dog-eat-dog world? And we decide in conclave together that that's not the kind of world in which we want to live. It's difficult. There is no absolute reason why we should believe that that's true - it's a moral decision which we take as individuals - and we take it collectively as a collection of individuals. If you want to get that sort of value system from religion I want you to ask yourself - whereabouts in religion do you get it? Which religion do you get it from? They're all different. If you get it from the Judeo-Christian-Islamic tradition then I beg you - don't get it from your holy book! Because the morality you will get from reading your holy book is hideous. Don't get it from your holy book. Don't get it from sucking up to your god. Don't get it from saying “oh, I'm terrified of going to hell so I'd better be good” - that's a very ignoble reason to be good. Instead - be good for good reasons. Be good for the reason that's you've decided together with other people the society we want to live in: a decent humane society. Not one based on absolutism, not one based on holy books and not one based on sucking up to.. looking over your shoulder to the divine spy camera in the sky.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roFdPHdhgKQ&t=59m29s
Richard Dawkins vs. Jonathan Sacks - BBC's RE:Think Festival (2012)

Hasonló szerzők

John Ronald Reuel Tolkien fénykép
John Ronald Reuel Tolkien 19
angol filológus, író, költő
Gilbert Keith Chesterton fénykép
Gilbert Keith Chesterton 35
angol író, filozófus, teológus
Niels Bohr fénykép
Niels Bohr 6
dán fizikus, az MTA tagja
Terry Pratchett fénykép
Terry Pratchett 55
angol fantasy- és science fiction-író
Bohumil Hrabal fénykép
Bohumil Hrabal 10
cseh író
Nagíb Mahfúz fénykép
Nagíb Mahfúz 6
egyiptomi író
John Lennon fénykép
John Lennon 38
brit énekes, zeneszerző, a The Beatles gitárosa
Max Planck fénykép
Max Planck 12
német fizikus
Romain Rolland fénykép
Romain Rolland 2
francia író