Richard Dawkins idézet
oldal 5

Clinton Richard Dawkins brit etológus, evolúciós biológus és népszerű tudományos író. 1995-től 2008-ig az Oxfordi Egyetemen Charles Simonyi által létrehozott Tudomány-népszerűsítő Tanszék vezetője. A Royal Society tagja, aktív ateista, műveiben gyakran foglalkozik vallási kérdésekkel. Hírnevét 1976-ban Az önző gén című könyvével alapozta meg, amelyben ismertette a géncentrikus evolúció lényegét és annak utolsó fejezetével megalkotta a memetika alapjait. Ezt követte 1982-ben A hódító gén. Gyakori vitapartner televíziós és rádiós műsorokban főként evolúciós biológiai, kreacionizmussal kapcsolatos és vallási témákban.

Emellett lelkes szekuláris humanista, szkeptikus és a Brights Mozgalom kiemelkedő alakja. Wikipedia  

✵ 26. március 1941
Richard Dawkins fénykép
Richard Dawkins: 329   idézetek 0   Kedvelés

Richard Dawkins híres idézetei

„Az önző gén”

Művei

„A hódító gén”

Művei

„Isteni téveszme”

Művei

Richard Dawkins: Idézetek angolul

“evidence is the only good reason to believe anything”

interview shown in AlJazeera https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0jA6VsivBE&t=0h26m04s, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0jA6VsivBE&t=0h28m37s

“Who (apart from the pig) is damaged by bacon?”

https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/480273220659339264 (21 June 2014)
Twitter

“The argument of this book is that we, and all other animals, are machines created by our genes.”

Richard Dawkins könyv The Selfish Gene

Forrás: The Selfish Gene (1976, 1989), Ch. 1. Why Are People?

“Yet scientists are required to back up their claims not with private feelings but with publicly checkable evidence. Their experiments must have rigorous controls to eliminate spurious effects. And statistical analysis eliminates the suspicion (or at least measures the likelihood) that the apparent effect might have happened by chance alone.Paranormal phenomena have a habit of going away whenever they are tested under rigorous conditions. This is why the £740,000 reward of James Randi, offered to anyone who can demonstrate a paranormal effect under proper scientific controls, is safe. Why don't the television editors insist on some equivalently rigorous test? Could it be that they believe the alleged paranormal powers would evaporate and bang go the ratings?Consider this. If a paranormalist could really give an unequivocal demonstration of telepathy (precognition, psychokinesis, reincarnation, whatever it is), he would be the discoverer of a totally new principle unknown to physical science. The discoverer of the new energy field that links mind to mind in telepathy, or of the new fundamental force that moves objects around a table top, deserves a Nobel prize and would probably get one. If you are in possession of this revolutionary secret of science, why not prove it and be hailed as the new Newton? Of course, we know the answer. You can't do it. You are a fake.Yet the final indictment against the television decision-makers is more profound and more serious. Their recent splurge of paranormalism debauches true science and undermines the efforts of their own excellent science departments. The universe is a strange and wondrous place. The truth is quite odd enough to need no help from pseudo-scientific charlatans. The public appetite for wonder can be fed, through the powerful medium of television, without compromising the principles of honesty and reason.”

[Human gullibility beyond belief,— the “paranormal” in the media, The Sunday Times, 1996-08-25]

“I am very conscious that you can't condemn people of an earlier era by the standards of ours. Just as we don't look back at the 18th and 19th centuries and condemn people for racism in the same way as we would condemn a modern person for racism, I look back a few decades to my childhood and see things like caning, like mild pedophilia, and can't find it in me to condemn it by the same standards as I or anyone would today.”

Giles Whittell, " The world according to Richard Dawkins http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/science/article4191347.ece" (), The Times, quoted in Trevor Grundy, " Richard Dawkins Pedophilia Remarks Provoke Outrage http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/09/richard-dawkins-pedophilia_n_3895514.html" (), The Huffington Post.

“Pantheism is sexed-up atheism. Deism is watered-down theism.”

Richard Dawkins könyv The God Delusion

Forrás: The God Delusion (2006), p. 40

“[If] there is mercy in nature, it is accidental. Nature is neither kind nor cruel but indifferent.”

Richard Dawkins könyv A Devil's Chaplain

"A Devil's Chaplain"
A Devil's Chaplain (2003)

“Whenever a system of communication evolves, there is always the danger that some will exploit the system for their own ends.”

Richard Dawkins könyv The Selfish Gene

Forrás: The Selfish Gene (1976, 1989), Ch. 4. The Gene machine

“Abort it and try again. It would be immoral to bring it into the world if you have the choice.”

On a hypothetical fetus with Down syndrome https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/statuses/502106262088466432 (20 August 2014)
Twitter

Hasonló szerzők

John Ronald Reuel Tolkien fénykép
John Ronald Reuel Tolkien 19
angol filológus, író, költő
Gilbert Keith Chesterton fénykép
Gilbert Keith Chesterton 35
angol író, filozófus, teológus
Niels Bohr fénykép
Niels Bohr 6
dán fizikus, az MTA tagja
Terry Pratchett fénykép
Terry Pratchett 55
angol fantasy- és science fiction-író
Bohumil Hrabal fénykép
Bohumil Hrabal 10
cseh író
Nagíb Mahfúz fénykép
Nagíb Mahfúz 6
egyiptomi író
John Lennon fénykép
John Lennon 38
brit énekes, zeneszerző, a The Beatles gitárosa
Max Planck fénykép
Max Planck 12
német fizikus
Romain Rolland fénykép
Romain Rolland 2
francia író