Iamblikhosz idézet

Iamblikhosz , szíriai, valószínűleg arameus származású, görögül író filozófus. Főleg Apameiában élt és tanított, az újplatonizmus dualista irányzatát hozta létre.

Az ókori hagyomány az újplatonista türoszi Porphüriosz tanítványának mondja.

A platóni és püthagoreus tanokat szintetizáló, misztikus rajongó volt, aki az isteneknek, a démonoknak és a lelkeknek az anyagi világ felé felé süllyedését és e süllyedésből a jóslás és a varázslás rejtélyes szertartásai útján való fölemelkedését és az istenséggel való egyesülését hirdetve, maga is titokzatos, csodás hírnevet szerzett magának. Csodatetteiről életrajzírója, Eunapiosz ír.

Az egyik legfontosabb műve a De Mysteriis, amit a misztériumokról írt. Iamblikhosz ebben azt állítja, hogy az olyan „barbár szent népek”, mint amilyenek az egyiptomiak és az asszírok voltak, még őrizték a régi tudást, még „ismerik az istenek eredeti neveit”, amit a hellének már elfelejtettek. Ennek pedig az az oka, hogy a keletiek hagyományőrzők, ellenben a hellének folyton újítanak. Ez a „csodás és titokzatos Kelet” toposza. Keleten még tudják a választ a legfontosabb kérdésekre, még őrzik az ősi titkot, amit Iamblikhosz kora a gyors fejlődésben és az új vallások, mint a kereszténység megjelenésével elfelejtett.Másik fontos műve a püthagoreusok iskolájáról írt könyve , bár ez leginkább kompiláció korábbi iratokból. Püthagorasz több művének is fő témája, mivel őt csodatévőnek ábrázolta és egyfajta Jézus-ellenképként is értelmezhető. „Az istenekről” című művét egyik leghíresebb követője Flavius Iulianus római császár felhasználta a „Héliosz király” című írásában. Iulianus a keresztény hit elhagyása után 351-ben Nikomédiába, Pergamonba, majd Epheszoszba utazott, ahol a neoplatonizmus és Iamblikhosz hívévé vált és Aedesius neoplatonista filozófus tanítványa lett. Wikipedia  

✵ 240 – 320
Iamblikhosz fénykép
Iamblikhosz: 15   idézetek 0   Kedvelés

Iamblikhosz: Idézetek angolul

“For us it is sufficient that this is the will of the Gods, which all enable us to undertake tasks even more arduous than these.”

Forrás: Life of Pythagoras, Ch. 1 : Importance of the Subject
Kontextus: Since wise people are in the habit of invoking the divinities at the beginning of any philosophic consideration, this is all the more necessary on studying that one which is justly named after the divine Pythagoras. Inasmuch as it emanated from the divinities it could not be apprehended without their inspiration and assistance. Besides, its beauty and majesty so surpasses human capacity, that it cannot be comprehended in one glance. Gradually only can some details of it be mastered when, under divine guidance we approach the subject with a quiet mind. Having therefore invoked the divine guidance, and adapted ourselves and our style to the divine circumstances, we shall acquiesce in all the suggestions that come to us. Therefore we shall not begin with any excuses for the long neglect of this sect, nor by any explanations about its having been concealed by foreign disciplines, or mystic symbols, nor insist that it has been obscured by false and spurious writings, nor make apologies for any special hindrances to its progress. For us it is sufficient that this is the will of the Gods, which all enable us to undertake tasks even more arduous than these. Having thus acknowledged our primary submission to the divinities, our secondary devotion shall be to the prince and father of this philosophy as a leader.

“After his father's death, though he was still but a youth, his aspect was so venerable, and his habits so temperate that he was honored and even reverenced by elderly men, attracting the attention of all who saw and heard him speak, creating the most profound impression.”

Forrás: Life of Pythagoras, Ch. 2 : Youth, Education, Travels
Kontextus: After his father's death, though he was still but a youth, his aspect was so venerable, and his habits so temperate that he was honored and even reverenced by elderly men, attracting the attention of all who saw and heard him speak, creating the most profound impression. That is the reason that many plausibly asserted that he was a child of the divinity. Enjoying the privilege of such a renown, of an education so thorough from infancy, and of so impressive a natural appearance he showed that he deserved all these advantages by deserving them, by the adornment of piety and discipline, by exquisite habits, by firmness of soul, and by a body duly subjected to the mandates of reason. An inimitable quiet and serenity marked all his words and actions, soaring above all laughter, emulation, contention, or any other irregularity or eccentricity; his influence at Samos was that of some beneficent divinity. His great renown, while yet a youth, reached not only men as illustrious for their wisdom as Thales at Miletus, and Bias at Prione, but also extended to the neighboring cities. He was celebrated everywhere as the "long-haired Samian," and by the multitude was given credit for being under divine inspiration.

“Since wise people are in the habit of invoking the divinities at the beginning of any philosophic consideration, this is all the more necessary on studying that one which is justly named after the divine Pythagoras.”

Forrás: Life of Pythagoras, Ch. 1 : Importance of the Subject
Kontextus: Since wise people are in the habit of invoking the divinities at the beginning of any philosophic consideration, this is all the more necessary on studying that one which is justly named after the divine Pythagoras. Inasmuch as it emanated from the divinities it could not be apprehended without their inspiration and assistance. Besides, its beauty and majesty so surpasses human capacity, that it cannot be comprehended in one glance. Gradually only can some details of it be mastered when, under divine guidance we approach the subject with a quiet mind. Having therefore invoked the divine guidance, and adapted ourselves and our style to the divine circumstances, we shall acquiesce in all the suggestions that come to us. Therefore we shall not begin with any excuses for the long neglect of this sect, nor by any explanations about its having been concealed by foreign disciplines, or mystic symbols, nor insist that it has been obscured by false and spurious writings, nor make apologies for any special hindrances to its progress. For us it is sufficient that this is the will of the Gods, which all enable us to undertake tasks even more arduous than these. Having thus acknowledged our primary submission to the divinities, our secondary devotion shall be to the prince and father of this philosophy as a leader.

“Anatolius says that it is called "matrix" and "matter," on the grounds that without it there is no number.
The mark which signifies the monad is the source of all things.”

On the Monad
The Theology of Arithmetic
Kontextus: Likewise, they call it "Chaos," which is Hesiod's first generator, because Chaos gives rise to everything else, as the monad does. It is also thought to be both "mixture" and "blending," "obscurity" and "darkness" thanks to the lack of articulation and distinction of everything which ensues from it.
Anatolius says that it is called "matrix" and "matter," on the grounds that without it there is no number.
The mark which signifies the monad is the source of all things.

“Gradually only can some details of it be mastered when, under divine guidance we approach the subject with a quiet mind. Having therefore invoked the divine guidance, and adapted ourselves and our style to the divine circumstances, we shall acquiesce in all the suggestions that come to us.”

Forrás: Life of Pythagoras, Ch. 1 : Importance of the Subject
Kontextus: Since wise people are in the habit of invoking the divinities at the beginning of any philosophic consideration, this is all the more necessary on studying that one which is justly named after the divine Pythagoras. Inasmuch as it emanated from the divinities it could not be apprehended without their inspiration and assistance. Besides, its beauty and majesty so surpasses human capacity, that it cannot be comprehended in one glance. Gradually only can some details of it be mastered when, under divine guidance we approach the subject with a quiet mind. Having therefore invoked the divine guidance, and adapted ourselves and our style to the divine circumstances, we shall acquiesce in all the suggestions that come to us. Therefore we shall not begin with any excuses for the long neglect of this sect, nor by any explanations about its having been concealed by foreign disciplines, or mystic symbols, nor insist that it has been obscured by false and spurious writings, nor make apologies for any special hindrances to its progress. For us it is sufficient that this is the will of the Gods, which all enable us to undertake tasks even more arduous than these. Having thus acknowledged our primary submission to the divinities, our secondary devotion shall be to the prince and father of this philosophy as a leader.

“Wait for the appointed hour.”

As quoted in The Lives of the Sophists by Eunapius ( online exerpt http://www.goddess-athena.org/Encyclopedia/Friends/Iamblichus/index.htm)

“The Pythagoreans called the monad "intellect" because they thought that intellect was akin to the One; for among the virtues, they likened the monad to moral wisdom; for what is correct is one.”

On the Monad
The Theology of Arithmetic
Kontextus: The Pythagoreans called the monad "intellect" because they thought that intellect was akin to the One; for among the virtues, they likened the monad to moral wisdom; for what is correct is one. And they called it "being," "cause of truth," "simple," "paradigm," "order," "concord," "what is equal among the greater and the lesser," "the mean between intensity and slackness," "moderation in plurality," "the instant now in time," and moreover they call it "ship," "chariot," "friend," "life," "happiness."