Philippe Baumard citations

Philippe Baumard est professeur des universités au CNAM de Paris et professeur à l'École de guerre économique et chercheur au sein de la chaire Innovation & Régulation des services numériques de l'École polytechnique. Ses thèmes de recherche sont la coopétition, l'apprentissage en situations adverses, la connaissance tacite, l'innovation et les façades organisationnelles, l'échec et le désapprentissage au cours de crises organisationnelles. Il a été professeur visitant à la Haas School of Business, université de Californie à Berkeley, de 2004 à 2007, puis visiting professor à l'université Stanford . Il est conseiller à la recherche du groupe ESLSCA et président du conseil scientifique du conseil supérieur de la formation et la recherche stratégiques. Il contribue également de manière récurrente à la Revue française de criminologie et de droit pénal éditée par l'Institut pour la Justice. Wikipedia  

✵ 1968
Philippe Baumard: 1   citation 0   J'aime

Philippe Baumard: Citations en anglais

““Organization theory,” a term that appeared in the middle of the twentieth century, has multiple meanings. When it first emerged, the term expressed faith in scientific research as a way to gain understanding of human beings and their interactions. Although scientific research had been occurring for several centuries, the idea that scientific research might enhance understanding of human behavior was considerably newer and rather few people appreciated it. Simon (1950, 1952-3, 1952) was a leading proponent for the creation of “organization theory”, which he imagined as including scientific management, industrial engineering, industrial psychology, the psychology of small groups, human-resources management, and strategy. The term “organization theory” also indicated an aspiration to state generalized, abstract propositions about a category of social systems called “organizations,” which was a very new concept. Before and during the 1800s, people had regarded armies, schools, churches, government agencies, and social clubs as belonging to distinct categories, and they had no name for the union of these categories. During the 1920s, some people began to perceive that diverse kinds of medium-sized social systems might share enough similarities to form a single, unified category. They adopted the term “organization” for this unified category.”

William H. Starbuck and Philippe Baumard (2009). "The seeds, blossoming, and scant yield of organization theory," in: Jacques Rojot et. al (eds.) Comportement organisationnel - Volume 3 De Boeck Supérieur. p. 15