Ervin László citations

Ervin László est un philosophe des sciences hongrois, théoricien des systèmes et théoricien du tout. Il a publié environ 75 livres et plus de 400 articles, et est l'éditeur de World Futures: The Journal of General Evolution.

En 1993, en réponse à son expérience avec le Club de Rome, il fonde le Club de Budapest.

Son livre, Science and the Akashic Field: An Integral Theory of Everything propose un champ d'information comme substance primordiale du cosmos. Utilisant le terme sanskrit et védique Akasha , il nomme ce champ d'informations « champ akashique » ou champ A. Il explique que le vacuum quantique est l'énergie fondamentale qui transporte des in-formations et informe non seulement l'univers présent, mais tous les univers passés et futurs . László décrit comment ce champ informant peut expliquer comment notre univers est si profondément bien réglé ainsi que comment se forment les galaxies et la vie consciente et pourquoi l'évolution est un processus non pas aléatoire, mais réglé. D'après son auteur, l'hypothèse pourrait résoudre plusieurs problèmes de la physique quantique, entre autres la non-localité et l'intrication quantique. Elle pourrait également contribuer à résoudre les contradictions entre religion et science. Wikipedia  

✵ 12. juin 1932
Ervin László: 46   citations 0   J'aime

Ervin László: Citations en anglais

“Cultures are, in the final analysis, value-guided systems.”

Source: The systems view of the world (1996), p. 75.

“We are living in a time of dissent, upheaval, revolutions and struggle, frequently aimed at mutual destruction.”

Ludwig von Bertalanffy, Ervin László (1972) The Relevance of general systems theory: papers presented to Ludwig von Bertalanffy on his seventieth birthday. p. 185.

“Yet while they exist, regardless of how long, each system has a specific structure made up of certain maintained relationships among its parts, and manifests irreducible characteristics of its own.”

Variante: Each system has a specific structure made up of certain maintained relationships among its parts, and manifests irreducible characteristics of its own.
Source: Introduction to Systems Philosophy (1972), p. 12.

“The description of the evolutionary trajectory of dynamical systems as irreversible, periodically chaotic, and strongly nonlinear fits certain features of the historical development of human societies. But the description of evolutionary processes, whether in nature or in history, has additional elements. These elements include such factors as the convergence of existing systems on progressively higher organizational levels, the increasingly efficient exploitation by systems of the sources of free energy in their environment, and the complexification of systems structure in states progressively further removed from thermodynamic equilibrium.
General evolution theory, based on the integration of the relevant tenets of general system theory, cybernetics, information and communication theory, chaos theory, dynamical systems theory, and nonequilibrium thermodynamics, can convey a sound understanding of the laws and dynamics that govern the evolution of complex systems in the various realms of investigation…. The basic notions of this new discipline can be developed to give an adequate account of the dynamical evolution of human societies as well. Such an account could furnish the basis of a system of knowledge better able to orient human beings and societies in their rapidly changing milieu.”

E. Laszlo et al. (1993) pp. xvii- xix; as cited in: Alexander Laszlo and Stanley Krippner (1992) " Systems Theories: Their Origins, Foundations, and Development http://archive.syntonyquest.org/elcTree/resourcesPDFs/SystemsTheory.pdf" In: J.S. Jordan (Ed.), Systems Theories and A Priori Aspects of Perception. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1998. Ch. 3, pp. 47-74.

“[ Technology is] the instrumentality for accessing and using free energies in human societies for human and social purposes.”

Laszlo (1992) "Information Technology and Social Change: An Evolutionary Systems Analysis". Behavioral Science 37: pp.237-249; As cited in: K.L. Dennis (2003, p. 36).

“The beginning of the twentieth century witnessed the breakdown of the mechanistic theory even within physics, the science where it was the most successful… Relativity took over in field physics, and the science of quantum theory in microphysics… In view of parallel developments in physics, chemistry, biology, sociology, and economics, many branches of the contemporary sciences became… ‘sciences of organized complexity’ — that is, systems sciences.”

Source: The systems view of the world (1996), p. 8 as cited in: Martha C. Beck (2013) "Contemporary Systems Sciences, Implications for the Nature and Value of Religion, the Five Principles of Pancasila, and the Five Pillars of Islam," Dialogue and Universalism-E Volume 4, Number 1/2013. p. 3 ( online http://www.emporia.edu/~cbrown/dnue/documents/vol04.no01.2013/Vol04.01.Beck.pdf).